Economic and Market Commentary

3 Characteristics of MMT

What is Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) and what are the policy implications? PIMCO experts explain what a paradigm shift from monetary policy toward fiscal policy means for global economies.

More from this section

Read Transcript

OliviaAlbrecht, Senior Vice President, Executive Office: Hi, I’m Olivia Albrecht, and I’m joined by my colleagues, Scott Mather and Joachim Fels. So Joachim, first brief us on what is MMT, and then we can get into what that means for policy.

JoachimFels, Global Economic Advisor: Yeah, Olivia. Well, this MMT stuff sounds quite wacky if you’ve been brought up with the standard text books, the standard economic text books.

However, I think it's not all utter nonsense, as some of—or actually many—mainstream economists are saying. Why is that? Well, what is MMT? I’m simplifying here, but I would say there are three key propositions in that theory.

The first one is that fiscal, rather than monetary, policy should be the main tool to steer the economy to aim at full employment and to control inflation.

So that's, by the way, why MMT—Modern Monetary Theory—is a misnomer. It should really be called modern fiscal theory, right? And some people also say this is actually not modern. These are all old ideas from the 1940s and 1950s, early Keynesian. 

But the basic idea is that fiscal policy should vary spending and deficit levels to achieve full employment.

Chart: A mountain chart shows the U.S. public debt outstanding as a % of GDP from 1929 2019. Debt peaked after 1929 and is nearing a similar level in 2019.

So if there's slack in the economy, you just spend more. And you let the deficit rise. And conversely, if there is over-employment and if inflation is showing up, then you should have contractionary fiscal policy. That's the first proposition.

The second proposition is that, well, don't worry about a debt crisis. Because MMT says this fiscal policy should be financed directly by the printing press. So the way this works is the government doesn't issue bonds to the market—to the public—but the government just goes to the central bank and uses an overdraft facility on its bank account with the Fed, right?

And by the way, the interest rate on that should be zero, according to the proponents.

So what happens is, the money supply goes up, as fiscal policy becomes more expansionary. The money supply goes down, the fiscal policy becomes contractionary. And therefore, the MMT people say the government cannot default because we are in a fiat currency system. We are indebted in our currency.

And then thirdly, there are a few other elements to MMT. So they want a job guarantee for people, a government issuing a job guarantee during downturns.

And there's also a proposal to break up monopolies in order to keep inflation low. So these are the key propositions. So the way I would characterize it is MMT puts the traditional division of labor between the government and the central bank on its head.

In our current system, the Fed is responsible for full employment and keeping inflation stable. And the government is responsible for being solvent.

And you just turn this on the head with MMT. The government becomes responsible for full employment and stable inflation. And the central bank's job is to keep the government solvent.

Olivia: Okay. So let's take it from theory to practice. What does this mean? Does this imply that economies are going to be heavily supported by fiscal policy as a consequence of this kind of new/old theory?

Joachim: Well, I mean first of all, I think MMT is unlikely to become a reality anytime soon, right? At least not in this form. But I think this MMT discussion and also other debates that are going on between mainstream economists, they all indicate that the paradigm is shifting towards fiscal policy becoming a more active tool. Basically, fiscal policy helping the central bank to achieve its goals.

Chart: A line graph charts the federal funds midpoint target range from 1984 to 2019, falling into PIMCO's new neutral range toward the end of the period.

I mean, what's happened over the past 10-20 years is that government's really left it to central banks to deal with all the issues out there. And so in a way you could say it's a good development that there is a recognition that government should actually become more active in terms of fiscal policy. And in times of low interest rates, if we're flatlining at the new neutral, that may seem like a very attractive proposition.

ScottMather, CIO U.S. Core Strategies: And it's already playing out. I mean, certainly the willingness to break the old fiscal rules, if you will, some explicit rules in the case of Europe, what you see France and Italy doing, for instance.

And then in the US, late stage fiscal expansion. There's not many other good points in time where you could find examples of that. So there's a sign that things have already shifted. Certainly, a willingness to experiment with fiscal policy in new ways.

Olivia: Thank you so much—both of you—for your insights today.

For more insights and information visit


All investments contain risk and may lose value.

Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are suitable for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Outlook and strategies are subject to change without notice.

Forecasts, estimates and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be interpreted as investment advice, as an offer or solicitation, nor as the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Forecasts and estimates have certain inherent limitations, and unlike an actual performance record, do not reflect actual trading, liquidity constraints, fees, and/or other costs. In addition, references to future results should not be construed as an estimate or promise of results that a client portfolio may achieve.

This material contains the current opinions of the manager and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.


Filters: Reset All


Close Filters Dropdown
  • Tags


  • Category


    Bond by Bond
    Economic and Market Commentary
    Investment Strategies
    PIMCO Foundation
    PIMCO Education
    View from the Investment Committee
  • Order By


    Most Recent
() filters applied

Multimedia Finder

Filter By:
  • Careers
  • Economic and Market Commentary
  • Investment Strategies
  • PIMCO Education
  • View from the Investment Committee
  • Viewpoints
  • Understanding Investing
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • W
Tina Adatia
Fixed Income Strategist
Olivia A. Albrecht
Head of ESG Business Strategy
Joshua Anderson
Head of Global ABS Portfolio Management
Andrew Balls
CIO Global Fixed Income
Justin Blesy
Asset Allocation Strategist
David L. Braun
Head of US Financial Institutions Portfolio Management
Nathaniel Brown
Director of the PIMCO Foundation
Erin Browne
Portfolio Manager, Multi-Asset Strategies
Libby Cantrill
Executive Office, Public Policy
Josh Davis
Global Head of Client Analytics
Pramol Dhawan
Head of Emerging Markets Portfolio Management
Joachim Fels
Global Economic Advisor
David Fisher
Co-Head of Strategic Accounts
Nick Granger
Portfolio Manager, Quantitative Analytics
Gregory Hall
Head of U.S. Global Wealth Management
Mary Hoppe
Daniel H. Hyman
Head of Agency MBS Portfolio Management
Daniel J. Ivascyn
Group Chief Investment Officer
Mark R. Kiesel
CIO Global Credit
Christine Long
Head of Retirement Marketing
Scott A. Mather
CIO U.S. Core Strategies
John Murray
Portfolio Manager, Commercial Real Estate
John Nersesian
Head of Advisor Education
Roger Nieves
Senior Advisor
Jason Odom
Strategist, Asset Allocation
Sonali Pier
Portfolio Manager, Multi-Sector Credit
Libby Rodney
Steve A. Rodosky
Portfolio Manager, Real Return and Long Duration
Emmanuel Roman
Chief Executive Officer
Steve Sapra
Client Solutions & Analytics
Jerome M. Schneider
Head of Short-Term Portfolio Management
Marc P. Seidner
CIO Non-traditional Strategies
Greg E. Sharenow
Portfolio Manager, Real Assets
Anmol Sinha
Fixed Income Strategist
Candice Stack
Head of Client Management, Americas
Kimberley Stafford
Global Head of Product Strategy
Cathy Stahl
Global Head of Marketing
Geraldine Sundstrom
Portfolio Manager, Asset Allocation
Eve Tournier
Head of European Credit Portfolio Management
Jerry Tsai
Quantitative Research Analyst
Jamie Weinstein
Portfolio Manager, Head of Corporate Special Situations
Tiffany Wilding
North American Economist
Ben S. Bernanke
Chair, Global Advisory Board
  • Alphabetical
  • Most Recent
Section : Date : Experts :
Reset All
Comparing Risk Assets in Mid-Cycle Markets
Economic and Market Commentary

Comparing Risk Assets in Mid-Cycle Markets(video)

Comparing Risk Assets in Mid-Cycle Markets

Growth-oriented asset classes are likely to shine, but not equally. Geraldine Sundstrom and Erin Browne discuss our views across asset classes, including equities, credits, currencies and rates, and how we’re positioning for a mid-cycle environment.

More from this Asset Allocation Outlook

Mid-Cycle Investing: Growth-Oriented and Selective
Cyclical Outlook: Peak Policy, Peak Inflation, Peak Growth
Implications from our Cyclical Outlook
PIMCO GIS Diversified Income Fund update
Unlocking Alternatives: Possibilities in Quantitative Analytics

Load more results Load {{cCtrl.fetchResults}} more results